While AI is highly versatile it’s certainly no panacea as it needs an adequate amount of pertinent data. While AI is highly versatile it’s certainly no panacea as it needs an adequate amount of pertinent data. Its success hinges the availability, quality and quantity of student data related to curricular outcomes. AI generally excels in interpreting text-based assignments that focus on lower-order thinking skills, such as true/false, multiple choice, and short-answer questions, because these tasks often rely on clear, rule-based answers and straightforward patterns in the text. AI can quickly analyze and recognize these patterns, making it highly effective for grading or assisting in such formats. For example, it can instantly match student responses to a set of correct answers or evaluate basic factual knowledge and comprehension, especially when the answers are concise and fact-driven.
However, when it comes to more complex written assignments, such as essays or research papers that require higher-order thinking—analysis, evaluation, and synthesis—AI is better suited for enhancing the mechanics of writing rather than deepening the subject matter expertise. While AI can provide valuable feedback on grammar, sentence structure, coherence, and even offer suggestions for improving clarity and style, it may struggle to fully grasp the nuances of a subject, especially at advanced levels.
In higher grades, where critical thinking and subject mastery become more important, AI may not effectively evaluate the depth of understanding or the originality of ideas. It may not fully appreciate context, cultural or historical significance, or creative interpretations that deviate from expected norms. For example, an AI might miss the subtlety of a well-crafted argument in an essay or fail to engage deeply with complex philosophical or theoretical content. Therefore, while AI can be a helpful tool in enhancing the technical aspects of writing, human educators are still essential for guiding students in critical thinking and subject-matter expertise, especially in more advanced academic settings.
Go to Part III
Comments